Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 12;35(3):743–752. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05449-x

Table 2.

Combined Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia Outcomes, Costs, and Value by Hospital Type and Patient Risk on Admission

Outcome (% unless noted) Cohort AMI (N = 43,990 pairs) HF (N = 84,985 pairs) PNA (N = 74,947 pairs) Combined patients (N = 203,922 pairs) Combined quintiles of risk on admission (Q1 = lowest) Trend P value*
Q1 (N = 41,851 pairs) Q2 (N = 39,207 pairs) Q3 (N = 39,738 pairs) Q4 (N = 40,547 pairs) Q5 (N = 42,579 pairs)
% of pairs 21.5 41.7 36.8 100.0 20.5 19.2 19.5 19.9 20.9
30-day mortality (%) Teaching 12.1 8.3 12.7 10.7 2.5 4.8 7.9 13.1 24.6 0.0001
Non-teaching 12.9 9.3 14.5 12.0 2.6 5.4 8.9 14.9 27.6
Difference − 0.9d − 1.0d − 1.8d − 1.3d − 0.1 − 0.6c − 0.9d − 1.8d − 3.0d
30-day resource cost ($, m-est.) Teaching 23,875 19,067 16,762 19,249 16,464 18,378 19,041 20,051 22,265 < 0.0001
Non-teaching 23,327 18,267 17,143 18,944 17,000 18,489 18,848 19,450 20,901
Difference 489d 756d − 382d 273d − 546d − 140 182 557d 1289d
Value estimate (95% CI) 563 (138, 989) 730 (465, 994) − 208 (− 300, − 116) 211 (119, 303) N.C. (N.C.) − 234 (− 680, 211) 193 (− 102, 489) 318 (143, 493) 427 (309, 546)
30-day total payments ($, m-est.) Teaching 29,930 21,017 19,314 22,304 21,075 22,125 21,863 22,490 23,913 < 0.0001
Non-teaching 24,060 15,677 14,789 17,141 16,703 17,420 17,044 16,899 17,624
Difference 5795d 5206d 4435d 5048d 4277d 4629d 4715d 5431d 6120d
Value estimate (95% CI) 6674 (3488, 9860) 5022 (3729, 6315) 2419 (1968, 2870) 3904 (3336, 4472) N.C. (N.C.) 7755 (3818, 11,692) 5010 (2929, 7091) 3097 (2257, 3938) 2030 (1634, 2425)
30-day payments without Geo, IME, or DSH ($, m-est.) Teaching 23,784 16,984 15,503 17,902 16,855 17,786 17,587 18,045 19,197 < 0.0001
Non-teaching 22,437 14,875 14,073 16,207 15,746 16,431 16,145 16,001 16,671
Difference 1332d 2054d 1408d 1662d 1086d 1349d 1420d 1972d 2440d
Value estimate (95% CI) 1534 (760, 2308) 1981 (1451, 2511) 768 (612, 925) 1286 (1080, 1492) N.C. (N.C.) 2259 (990, 3529) 1509 (832, 2185) 1125 (796, 1453) 809 (641, 977)
ICU use (%) Teaching 46.8 13.8 11.1 19.9 16.6 19.6 19.8 20.7 22.7 0.0921
Non-teaching 48.7 16.1 14.0 22.4 18.6 22.3 22.5 23.0 25.3
Difference − 2.0d − 2.3d − 2.9d − 2.5d − 2.0d − 2.7d − 2.7d − 2.3d − 2.6d
30-day readmission or death (%) Teaching 32.9 29.5 30.0 30.4 20.9 25.0 28.2 33.3 44.1 0.0003
Non-teaching 36.2 30.9 31.6 32.3 23.6 27.1 29.9 34.8 45.5
Difference − 3.3d − 1.4d − 1.6d − 1.9d − 2.8d − 2.1d − 1.7d − 1.5d − 1.4d
Length of stay (days, m-est.) Teaching 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.5 5.0 5.4 5.9 6.8 0.6208
Non-teaching 4.6 4.9 5.6 5.1 4.1 4.6 4.9 5.4 6.3
Difference 0.7d 0.6d 0.1d 0.4d 0.4d 0.4d 0.4d 0.4d 0.5d

Value expressed as increased cost or payment at teaching hospitals per 1% reduction in mortality. Individual tables for AMI, HF, and PNA are provided in the Appendix. P value key is as follows: aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01, cP < 0.001, and dP < 0.0001. Non-significant differences have no letter. P values for binary overall outcomes and within strata were calculated using McNemar’s test. P values and estimates for continuous overall outcomes and within strata were calculated using M-statistics. Value is well defined if there is a significant difference in mortality between groups. Otherwise in this table, values are reported as N.C. (not calculated). For all value estimates and confidence intervals reported, all 1000 jackknives concur in finding a statistically significant difference in mortality

*Trends for binary outcomes were tested using the Mantel test for trend, while trends for continuous outcomes were tested using robust regression