Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 28;2015(1):CD010632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010632.pub2

3. Demographic and participant characteristics of participants included in analysis.

Study N / n (included in analysis) Age converters (non‐converters) Gender
(M %)
MMSE score
converters (non‐converters)
APOE Ɛ4 carrier (%) MCI diagnostic criteria Sampling Sources of referral Sources of recruitment
(setting)
Anchisi 2005
(Italy)
67/48 71.1 ± 73.9
(65.0 ± 9.0)
25 (52.1) 26.6 ± 1.7
(28.4 ± 1.1)
Not reported Patterson 2010 Consecutive sample
(email from the author on 22nd October 2013)
GP surgeries
(email from the author on 22nd October 2013)
Outpatients from
4 University Departments (Milan, Brescia, Cologne and Dresden)
(email on 22nd October 2013)
Arnáiz 2001
(Sweden)
20/20 64.9 ± 8.3
(60.1 ± 8.4)
12 (60.0) 26.7 ± 1.8
(27.2 ± 2.9)
Not reported Global Deterioration Scale Consecutive sample Not reported Geriatric University clinic
Berent 1999
(USA)
20/20 70.2 ± 5.5
Total sample
13 (65.0) 26.0 ± 1.9
Total sample
Not reported AAMI
criteria
Not
reported
Not reported Cognitive disorders University clinic
Chételat 2003
(France)
19/17 73.0 ± 5.1
(67.8 ± 7.0)
8 (45.2) 26.3 ± 1.0
(27.8 ± 1.2)
Not reported Petersen 2001 Not
reported
Not reported Not reported
Clerici 2009
(Italy)
30/26 74.2 ± 6.9
Total sample
10 (33.3) 26.2 ± 1.7
Total sample
Not reported Petersen 2004 and CDR = 0.5 criteria Not
reported
GP surgeries or specialists (85%) or self referral (15%) University Centre for Research and Treatment
Drzezga 2005
(Germany)
30/30 74.7 ± 4.7
(67.6 ± 2.0)
14 (46.7) 25.9 ± 2.1
(27.6 ± 1.5)
17 (56.7) Petersen 1999 and CDR = 0.5 criteria Not
reported
GP surgeries or
specialists or other institutions
University Research Unit
Fellgiebel 2007
(Germany)
16/16 69.5 ± 7.9
(68.8 ± 10.0)
9 (56.2) 24.3 ± 1.5
(27.3 ± 1.8)
Not reported Petersen 1999 Consecutive sample Not reported University memory clinic
Galluzzi 2010
(Italy)
90/38 72.0 ± 7.1
Total sample
37 (41.1) 26.1 ± 1.8
Total sample
35 (38.9) Petersen 1999 Consecutive sample Not reported Outpatient memory clinic
Herholz 2011
(USA)
ADNI participants
94/94 75.0 ± 7.6
Total sample
66 (70.2) 2671 ± 1.6
Total sample
Not reported Petersen 2010 &
CDR = 0.5
Not
reported
Not reported Multicentre (not specified)
Landau 2010
(USA)
ADNI participants
85/85 78.3 ± 7.5
(78.0 ± 7.4)
56 (65.9) 26.4 ± 1.7
(27.3 ± 1.6)
25 (29.4) Petersen 2010 &
CDR=0.5
Not
reported
Not reported Multicenter (not specified)
Mosconi 2004
(Italy)
37/37 69.0 ± 4.0
(63.0 ± 8.0)
17 (45.9) 23.9 ± 1.7
(28.1 ± 1.6)
16 (43.2) Petersen 2010 Not
reported
Not reported Not reported
Nobili 2008
(Italy)
36/33 77.3 ± 4.8
(74.6 ± 5.4)
13 (39.4) 69.0 ± 4.0
(63.0 ± 8.0)
Not reported on all MCI included in analysis Petersen 2004 Not
reported
Not reported Outpatients
Ossenkoppele 2012a
(Netherlands)
15/12 67.0 ± 7.0
Sample analysed
9 (75%)
Sample analysed
75.0 ± 7.6
Sample analysed
8 (66.7)
Sample analysed
Petersen 1999 Not
reported
Not
reported
Not reported
Ossenkoppele 2012b
(Netherlands)
30/12 64.0 ± 9.0
Total sample
23 (30.4)
Total sample
75.0 ± 7.6
Total sample
Not reported Petersen 2001 Not
reported
Not
reported
Outpatient University memory clinic
Pardo 2010
(USA)
19/18 Reader 1
19/19 Reader 2
Mean 80.0 (range 54 ‐ 83)
Total sample
Not reported Not reported Not reported Petersen 1999 Not
reported
Not reported Geriatric, Research, Education and Medical Centre
Unclear
Schmand 2012
(Netherlands)
ADNI participants
89/89 Not reported on the sample with ¹⁸F‐FDG scan (N = 89) Not reported on the sample with ¹⁸F‐FDG scan (N = 89) Not reported on the sample with ¹⁸F‐FDG scan (N = 89) Not reported on the sample with ¹⁸F‐FDG scan (N = 89) Petersen 2010 &
CDR = 0.5
Not
reported
Not reported Multicentre (not specified)

ADNI: Alzheimer's Disease neuroimaging initiative