Cuckle 1999a.
Clinical features and settings | High‐risk referral for invasive testing and routine screening. | |
Participants | 6730 participants. USA, UK and other European countries –multicentre study. Dates not reported. Pregnant women. 14‐19 weeks' gestation. |
|
Study design | Prospective cohort study. | |
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Down's syndrome: 39 cases. Reference standard: amniocentesis, CVS or postnatal examination. |
|
Index and comparator tests | Maternal urine beta core hCG (Chiron manual assay). | |
Follow‐up | Methods of follow‐up not reported. | |
Aim of study | A prospective evaluation of urine beta core hCG for Down's syndrome. | |
Notes | ||
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Yes | Selective testing of high‐risk women as done in practice. |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Karyotyping or follow‐up to birth. |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Unclear | Unclear if all women received a reference standard. |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | No | Women had different reference standards. |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | Index tests did not form part of the reference standard. |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | No | Reference standard interpreted with knowledge of index test results. |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | Index test conducted without knowledge of the reference standard. |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Yes | Information available as would be in standard clinical practice. |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | No | No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements. |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | No | No details of withdrawals given. |