Spencer 1996.
Clinical features and settings | High‐risk referral for invasive testing. | |
Participants | 429 participants: 29 cases and 400 controls. UK. Date not specified. Pregnant women. Singleton pregnancies. 14‐24 (cases) and 9‐22 (controls) weeks' gestation. |
|
Study design | Case‐control study. | |
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Down's syndrome: 29 cases. Reference standards: amniocentesis or CVS. |
|
Index and comparator tests | Urine free beta hCG (CIS immunoradiometric assay). Urinary beta core fragment (Ciba Corning diagnostics UGP enzyme immunoassay). |
|
Follow‐up | 100% karyotyping. | |
Aim of study | To evaluate whether free beta hCG is elevated in the urine of pregnancies affected by Down's syndrome and investigate whether urine free beta hCG may be used as possible screening markers. | |
Notes | ||
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Yes | Selective testing of high‐risk women as done in practice. |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Amniocentesis or CVS. |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Yes | All women had a reference standard. |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | No | Women had different reference standards. |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | Reference standard was independent of the index test. |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | Yes | Reference standard interpreted without knowledge of index test results. |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | Index test interpreted without knowledge of reference standard results. |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Yes | Information available as would be in standard clinical practice. |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | No | No details given for test failures/uninterpretable measurements. |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | No | No details of withdrawals given. |