Skip to main content
. 2016 May 3;2016(5):CD002024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002024.pub5

Carnwath 1998.

Methods Randomised, controlled, double‐blind trial
Participants Setting: home‐based, Manchester, UK.
Participants: 50, opioid dependent by DSM‐IV, using methadone or other opiates.
Group sizes: (1) n = 26, (2) n = 24.
(1) 43%, (2) 71% used iv, otherwise groups similar.
Mean age: 28 years.
70% men.
Mean 6.9 years opiate use.
66% had previous detoxification experience; 17% employed, 63% supported by relative.
Interventions All stabilised on methadone (40 mg/day or less) prior to study. (1) n = 26: lofexidine, 0.2 mg/capsule, or (2) n = 24: clonidine 0.1 mg/capsule. Both increased over 3 days to max 8 capsules/day, and tapered over last 3 days. Various adjunct medications available. Total duration of medication unclear. Home‐based treatment with participants visited at least 4 times in week 1, 3 times in week 2, and once in each of weeks 3 and 4. Treatment considered successful if participants opiate‐free by urine test at 4 weeks. Scheduled duration 12 days
Outcomes Number completing treatment; number with extra home visits; mean withdrawal scores; mean side effects score
Notes Participants completed Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale (10 items, 0 to 3 severity) during each visit by trial personnel. Financial support provided by Britannia Pharmaceuticals and the "North West Region Medical Innovation Scheme"
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Patients were assigned randomly ..."
Comment: Although the method of sequence generation was not reported, the similarity of the groups and allocation by the separate pharmacy suggests the method was adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Treatment courses were sent out to patients by Trafford pharmacy, which also conducted the treatment group assignment without knowledge of patient or drug team staff."
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes ‐ intensity of withdrawal, adverse effects Low risk Participants and treating staff blind to treatment. Drugs prepared in identical capsules
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes ‐ duration of treatment, completion of treatment Low risk Participants and treating staff blind to treatment. Drugs prepared in identical capsules
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Those [participants] stopping early experienced higher maximum SOWS scores."
Comment: Differential drop‐out may have reduced mean daily SOWS score in clonidine group to a greater extent than the lofexidine group, but this outcome was not used in this review
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None apparent
Other bias Low risk None apparent