Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 19;11:1459. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15315-8

Table 1.

Summary of clinical data (A) and patient numbers in correlative analyses (B).

(A)
Clinical details N (%)
Age (years)a 60 (46–83)b
ECOGa
   1 44 (71)
   2 18 (29)
Platinum responsec
 Sensitive/ineligible 16 (25)
 Resistant/refractory 46 (74)
 Prior lines of therapyb 3 (1–5)
Confirmed BOR
   CR 3 (5)
   PR 8 (13)
   SD 28 (45)
   PD 20 (32)
   ND 3 (5)
Duration of response (days) 190 (123–441)b
(B)
Correlative analyses N (%)
HRD test 55 (89)
BRCAmut 60 (97)
PD-L1 IHC 44 (71)
RAD51 IHC 38 (61)
BROCA 52 (84)
Oncopanel 39 (63)
Nanostring 44 (71)
CycIF 26 (37)

ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status, BOR best objective response, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease, ND not defined.

aAt screening.

bMedian (range).

cResponse to last platinum-based chemotherapy.

ECOG; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status, BOR; Best objective response, CR; Complete response, PR; Partial response, SD; Stable disease, PD; Progressive disease, ND; Not defined.