Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;5(10):4816–4827. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03514

Table 2. Differentially Expressed TFs Whose Binding Sites Are Enriched in the Different Developmental Stagesa.

comparison gene symbol FC description
hPSC vs DE EOMES 47.4 eomesodermin
  FOXA2 3.7 forkhead box A2
  GATA4 4.8 GATA binding protein 4
  KLF5 4.4 Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal)
  NANOG –3.8 Nanog homeobox
  POU5F1 –7.7 POU class 5 homeobox 1
  PRDM14 –11.2 PR domain containing 14
  SOX2 –17.6 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2
DE vs hepatoblasts AHR 6.1 aryl hydrocarbon receptor
  E2F7 –3.1 E2F TF 7
  EOMES –47.0 eomesodermin
  NANOG –7.7 Nanog homeobox
hepatoblasts vs hPSC-HEP day 25 CDX2 3.4 caudal type homeobox 2
  KLF5 3.2 Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal)
hPSC-HEP day 25 vs AL AR 4.4 AR
  CDX2 –5.2 caudal type homeobox 2
  KLF5 –5.9 Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal)
a

FC > 0 upregulation in the second developmental stage in the comparison; FC < 0 upregulation in the first developmental stage in the comparison.