Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 15;32(2):324–328. doi: 10.1177/1040638720903346

Table 2.

Comparison of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus–neutralizing antibody detection by day post-inoculation (dpi): fluorescent focus neutralization (FFN) versus high-throughput neutralization test (HTNT).

dpi* % positive FFN % positive HTNT by total fluorescence ratio
TFR ≥ 70 TFR ≥ 75 TFR ≥ 80 TFR ≥ 85 TFR ≥ 90
−4 0 (0, 17) 0 (0, 17) 0 (0, 17) 0 (0, 17) 0 (0, 17) 0 (0, 17)
0 5 (0, 25) 5 (0, 25) 0 (0, 17) 0 (0, 17) 0 (0, 17) 0 (0, 17)
7 40 (19, 64) 60 (36, 81) 40 (19, 64) 35 (14, 56) 25 (9, 49) 10 (1, 32)
14 95 (75, 100) 100 (83, 100) 100 (83, 100) 95 (75, 100) 95 (75, 100) 90 (68, 99)
21 100 (82, 100) 100 (82, 100) 100 (82, 100) 100 (82, 100) 100 (82, 100) 100 (82, 100)
28 95 (75, 100) 95 (75, 100) 95 (75, 100) 95 (75, 100) 95 (75, 100) 90 (68, 99)
35 90 (68, 99) 90 (68, 99) 90 (68, 99) 90 (68, 99) 90 (68, 99) 85 (62, 97)
42 100 (83, 100) 100 (83, 100) 100 (83, 100) 100 (83, 100) 95 (75, 100) 95 (75, 100)

Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

*

Sample size was 20 pigs with the exception of dpi 21 (19 pigs).

FFN neutralizing endpoint titers ≥1:20 were considered positive.10

Sample total fluorescence intensity (TFI) was standardized as total fluorescence ratio (TFR), where TFR = 100 – ([average sample TFI × 100] ÷ average negative control TFI).