Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 18;52:15. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00534-w

Table 3.

Marker quality filtering using different thresholds for call rate and ΔICL

ΔICL threshold Marker call rate threshold
0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0 0.02604 (3668) 0.02573 (3774) 0.02505 (4505) 0.02338 (7411) 0.0263 (29,905)
50 0.01582 (16,329) 0.01571 (16,340) 0.01545 (16,423) 0.01471 (17,526) 0.01461 (34,111)
100 0.00924 (29,888) 0.00916 (29,892) 0.00906 (29,902) 0.0089 (30,076) 0.00723 (39,535)
150 0.00433 (38,521) 0.00433 (38,521) 0.00433 (38,521) 0.0043 (38,535) 0.00287 (43,563)
200 0.00206 (43,557) 0.00206 (43,557) 0.00206 (43,557) 0.002 (43,561) 0.00114 (46,168)
250 0.0007 (46,679) 0.0007 (46,679) 0.0007 (46,679) 0.0007 (46,679) 0.00051 (47,936)
300 0.00037 (48,705) 0.00037 (48,705) 0.00037 (48,705) 0.00037 (48,705) 0.00029 (49,286)

Filtering markers using trios of triploid offspring and diploid parents with predicted sexes using marker call rate thresholds (top row in bold) and thresholds for ΔICL (left column in italic). The first number in each internal cell is the overall ER for all markers and all trios where there are informative genotypes (i.e. trios where offspring and at least one parent has called genotypes, see Table 2). The number of removed markers is shown in parenthesis.