Table 1.

The $\text{W}$ jet mass peak position (m) and resolution ($\sigma$), and the $\text{W}$ -tagging efficiencies, as extracted from top quark enriched data and from simulation, together with the corresponding data-to-simulation scale factors. The uncertainties in the scale factors include systematic uncertainties estimated as described in Ref. [62]

	m [$\text{Ge}$ ]	$\sigma$ [$\text{Ge}$ ]	$\text{W}$-tagging efficiency
2016
${\tau }_{21}^{\mathrm{DDT}}<0.43$
Data	$82.0\pm 0.5\text{(stat)}$	$7.1\pm 0.5\text{(stat)}$	$0.080\pm 0.008\text{(stat)}$
Simulation	$80.9\pm 0.2\text{(stat)}$	$6.6\pm 0.2\text{(stat)}$	$0.085\pm 0.003\text{(stat)}$
Data/simulation	$1.014\pm 0.007(\text{stat}+\text{syst})$	$1.09\pm 0.09(\text{stat}+\text{syst})$	$0.94\pm 0.10(\text{stat}+\text{syst})$
$0.43<{\tau }_{21}^{\mathrm{DDT}}<0.79$
Data			$0.920\pm 0.008\text{(stat)}$
Simulation			$0.915\pm 0.003\text{(stat)}$
Data/simulation			$1.006\pm 0.009(\text{stat}+\text{syst})$
2017
${\tau }_{21}^{\mathrm{DDT}}<0.43$
Data	$80.8\pm 0.4\text{(stat)}$	$7.7\pm 0.4\text{(stat)}$	$0.065\pm 0.006\text{(stat)}$
Simulation	$82.2\pm 0.3\text{(stat)}$	$7.1\pm 0.3\text{(stat)}$	$0.068\pm 0.005\text{(stat)}$
Data/simulation	$0.983\pm 0.007(\text{stat}+\text{syst})$	$1.08\pm 0.08(\text{stat}+\text{syst})$	$0.96\pm 0.12(\text{stat}+\text{syst})$
$0.43<{\tau }_{21}^{\mathrm{DDT}}<0.79$
Data			$0.935\pm 0.006\text{(stat)}$
Simulation			$0.932\pm 0.005\text{(stat)}$
Data/simulation			$1.003\pm 0.008(\text{stat}+\text{syst})$