Figure 10:

The performances on different evaluation metrics of various scoring functions on CASF-2007 benchmark. a) scoring power ranked by Pearson correlation coefficient, b) ranking power assessed by the high-level success measurement, and c) docking power measured by the rate of successfully identifying the “native” pose from 100 poses for each ligand. Our developed models, namely TopBP⁴⁹, EIC-Score⁸⁹, and AGL-Score⁶⁶ are colored in orange, and other scoring functions^{48,89,149,160–163} are colored in teal.