Table 4.
Logistic regression predicting likelihood of presence of abuse, based on Selective Reminding Test (STR), WCST, and TMT.
| B | S.E. | Wald | Df | sig | Exp(B) | 95% C.I for Exp(B) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Selective Reminding Test STR | 0.343 | 0.171 | 4.026 | 1 | 0.045 | 1.409 | 1.008 | 1.969 |
| WCST – failure to maintain set | 2.378 | 1.117 | 4.535 | 1 | 0.033 | 10.787 | 1.208 | 96.296 |
| TMT – B | 0.029 | 0.013 | 4.844 | 1 | 0.028 | 1.030 | 1.003 | 1.057 |
| Constant | -7.135 | 2.346 | 9,248 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.001 | ||
Note: reference category: abuse victim's group. All tests were two-tailed. Bold data corresponds to the level of significance.