Table 2.
Optimization of the key reaction parametersa.
![]() | ||||
| Entryb | IL amountc (wt %) | Temp. (°C) | Vacuum degree (kPa) | Acid value (mg KOH/g) |
| 1 | 10 | 160 | 50 | 123 |
| 2 | 10 | 170 | 50 | 106 |
| 3 | 10 | 180 | 50 | 92 |
| 4 | 10 | 190 | 50 | 88 |
| 5 | 10 | 200 | 50 | 86 |
| 6 | 0 | 190 | 50 | 148 |
| 7 | 5 | 190 | 50 | 117 |
| 8 | 15 | 190 | 50 | 73 |
| 9 | 20 | 190 | 50 | 69 |
| 10 | 15 | 190 | 0 | 101 |
| 11 | 15 | 190 | 10 | 63 |
| 12 | 15 | 190 | 30 | 52 |
| 13 | 15 | 190 | 50 | 44 |
| 14 | 15 | 190 | 70 | 43 |
aStandard reaction conditions: ricinoleic acid (10 g, 30 mmol) and different amount of IL at a variety of temperature and vacuum degree; breaction time, 2 h (entries 1–9), 8 h (entries 10–14); cbased on ricinoleic acid.
