Table 3.
Subgroup | Placebo | BC | AT | AT + BC | Test of interaction: P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group C: vitamin C ≥ 90 mg/d and fruit and vegetables ≥275 g/d | |||||
RR | 1·0 | 6·1 | 2·8 | 2·5 | 0·030 |
95 % CI | Reference | 1·4, 27 | 0·57, 14 | 0·48, 13 | |
Deaths | 2 | 13 | 6 | 5 | |
Participants | 69 | 81 | 78 | 73 | |
Person-years | 429 | 469 | 468 | 443 | |
Rate | 4·7 | 27·7 | 12·8 | 11·6 | |
Group B: vitamin C ≥ 90 mg/d and fruit and vegetables <275 g/d | |||||
RR | 1·0 | 0·45 | 0·85 | 0·98 | 0·08 |
95 % CI | Reference | 0·19, 1·02 | 0·44, 1·7 | 0·51, 1·9 | |
Deaths | 19 | 8 | 16 | 17 | |
Participants | 171 | 157 | 168 | 157 | |
Person-years | 1010 | 945 | 995 | 915 | |
Rate | 18·8 | 8·5 | 16·1 | 18·6 | |
Group A: vitamin C < 90 mg/d | |||||
RR | 1·0 | 2·26 | 1·50 | 1·63 | 0·06 |
95 % CI | Reference | 1·27, 4·00 | 0·82, 2·70 | 0·90, 3·00 | |
Deaths | 17 | 35 | 29 | 30 | |
Participants | 223 | 214 | 261 | 251 | |
Person-years | 1341 | 1228 | 1532 | 1463 | |
Rate | 12·7 | 28·5 | 18·9 | 20·5 | |
Test of difference (2 df) over the subgroups A to C; P | 0·0004 | 0·3 | 0·4 |
RR, risk ratio.
This subgroup analysis is restricted to the heavy smokers (≥21/d) who started smoking late in life (≥21 years), i.e. the lower right-hand corner in Table 1. In all, 145 participants with missing dietary data were excluded from this analysis, which left 1903 participants. A conservative approach to analyse this Table is to first assume that each subgroup A to C has a uniform mortality rate over all the trial arms. Thereafter each of the three treatment groups BC, AT and AT + BC in each of the three subgroups A to C are allowed their own treatment effect, leading to a total of 3 × 3 = 9 effect estimates. When the nine treatment effects were allowed for the Cox model, it was improved (χ2 (9 df) = 22·0; P = 0·009), compared with the model that assumes no effects of BC or vitamin E or their combination. Thereafter, the heterogeneity within the treatment arms was further examined. Adding a uniform BC effect gave RR 1·56 (95 % CI 1·03, 2·36), a uniform vitamin E (AT) effect gave RR 1·25 (95 % CI 0·82, 1·90), and a uniform AT + BC effect gave RR 1·37 (95 % CI 0·90, 2·08). When individual BC effects shown in this Table were allowed for the three subgroups A to C in the BC arm, the Cox regression model was improved (χ2 (2 df) = 15·7; P = 0·0004). When individual AT effects were allowed for the three subgroups of the AT arm, the model was improved (χ2 (2 df) = 2·8; P = 0·3), and individual AT + BC effects to the AT + BC arm improved the model (χ2 (2 df) = 1·8; P = 0·4). The interaction between BC and vitamin E in subgroups A to C in this Table was calculated by first including the BC and vitamin E effects into the model, and thereafter adding the interaction terms. The fit of the Cox model increased (χ2 (3 df) = 11·1; P = 0·011). There are no substantial baseline differences between the four arms in subgroups A, B or C (Supplementary Table S1 of Supplementary material).