Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 13;11:293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00293

TABLE 1.

Comparison of measurement models.

Model Descriptions χ2 df χ2/df Δχ2 CFI IFI RMSEA
Model 1 Five factors: CS, HS, ED, EI, AS 358.97 265.00 1.35 0.98 0.98 0.04
Model 2 Four factors: CS, HS, ED + EI, AS 714.25 269.00 2.66 355.28** 0.94 0.94 0.09
Model 3 Four factors: CS, HS, ED, EI + AS 766.16 269.00 2.85 407.19** 0.94 0.94 0.09
Model 4 Four factors: CS, HS + ED, EI, AS 836.20 269.00 3.11 477.23** 0.94 0.94 0.10
Model 5 Four factors: CS + HS, ED, EI, AS 1,096.35 269.00 4.08 737.38** 0.91 0.91 0.12
Model 6 Three factors: CS, HS + ED, EI + AS 1,233.63 272.00 4.54 874.66** 0.89 0.89 0.13
Model 7 Three factors: CS + HS, ED + EI, AS 1,455.05 272.00 5.35 1,096.08** 0.87 0.87 0.14
Model 8 Two factors: CS + HS, ED + EI + AS 1,783.80 274.00 6.51 1,424.83** 0.83 0.83 0.16
Model 9 Two factors: CS + HS + ED, EI + AS 2,163.27 274.00 7.90 1,804.30** 0.81 0.81 0.17
Model 10 One factor: CS + HS + ED + EI + AS 2,305.27 275.00 8.38 1,946.30** 0.78 0.78 0.18

N = 228. CS = challenge stressors, HS = hindrance stressors, ED = ego depletion, EI = emotional intelligence, AS = abusive supervision behavior, RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation, CFI = comparative fit index, IFI = incremental fit index. **p < 0.01.