Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 13;11:425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00425

TABLE 3.

Summary of models compared for Feeling of Knowing.

Dependent variable: Feeling of Knowing
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Age at baseline −0.017*** (0.006) −0.008 (0.006) −0.008 (0.006)
Vocabulary-WAIS 0.015** (0.006) 0.010 (0.006) 0.010 (0.006)
Evaluation Time 0.013 (0.007) 0.011 (0.008)
MCI-Stable −0.017 (0.018) −0.056 (0.046)
MCI-Worsened −0.132*** (0.024) −0.118** (0.060)
Evaluation Time × MCI-Stable 0.020 (0.022)
Evaluation Time × MCI-Worsened −0.008 (0.031)
Intercept 3.857*** (0.006) 3.845*** (0.015) 3.849*** (0.017)
Observations 751 751 751
Log Likelihood −1,999.809 −1,981.637 −1,981.159
Akaike Inf. Crit. 4,007.618 3,977.273 3,980.318
Bayesian Inf. Crit. 4,025.470 4,025.514 4,020.485
Bayes Factor 4806.453 0.0025

All models included random effects for intercepts and Age and Vocabulary at baseline as covariates. Model 1 is the null mixed model (i.e., intercepts and covariates only); Model 2 is the mixed model with main effects; and Model 3 is the mixed model with main effects and interactions. Coefficients and standard errors (in parentheses). ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01.