Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 13;10:310. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00310

Table 5.

Concordance of mutation results between fresh frozen and FFPE tissues, at the gene level.

Mutation Genes a* b* c* d* Concordance# Kappa P
AKT1 1 0 1 116 99.2% 0.663 <0.001
BRAF 1 0 2 116 99.2% 0.796 <0.001
CTNNB1 0 0 1 118 100.0% 1.000 <0.001
DDR2 1 0 1 116 99.2% 0.663 <0.001
EGFR 1 1 0 114 98.3% −0.009 0.925
ERBB2 0 0 1 105 100.0% 1.000 <0.001
ERBB4 2 1 2 113 97.5% 0.559 <0.001
FBXW7 5 3 13 64 90.6% 0.706 <0.001
FGFR2 1 0 2 113 99.1% 0.796 <0.001
KRAS 16 8 46 92 85.2% 0.679 <0.001
MAP2K1 1 0 4 99 99.0% 0.884 <0.001
NRAS 3 3 2 106 94.7% 0.372 <0.001
PIK3CA 10 12 18 90 83.1% 0.512 <0.001
PTEN 5 2 6 57 90.0% 0.575 <0.001
SMAD4 5 2 6 111 94.4% 0.602 <0.001
TP53 10 35 54 73 73.8% 0.481 <0.001
*

a, Mutation identified in fresh frozen tissue, but not in FFPE tissue; b, Mutation identified in FFPE tissue, but not in fresh frozen tissue; c, Mutation identified in FFPE and fresh frozen tissue; d, Mutation was not identified in FFPE or fresh frozen tissue;

#

Concordance = (c+d)/(a+b+c+d).