Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 May;17(4):585–596. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0248

Table 4.

Areas under ROC Curves for Observed and Imputed Data, Continuous, Dichotomized, and Trichotomized Scales

Continuous Dichotomized scales used in current study Trichotomized scales suggested by imputed ROC analyses
Observed
ROC 95%CI ROC 95% CI
  EPDS 0.84 0.70–0.99 0–9 vs. ≥10 0.75 0.58–0.91
  PHQ-9 0.79 0.62–0.97 0–9 vs. ≥10 0.59 0.44–0.75
  PDSS_SF 0.73 0.53–0.93 7–13 vs. ≥14 0.49 0.39–0.59
 Imputed
ROC 95%CI ROC 95% CI
  EPDS 0.88 0.81–0.95 0–9 vs. ≥10 0.69 0.65–0.75 0–5, 6–9, ≥10 0.81
  PHQ-9 0.80 0.72–0.88 0–9 vs. ≥10 0.59 0.56–0.62 0–2, 3–6, ≥7 0.78
  PDSS_SF 0.82 0.74–0.90 7–13 vs. ≥14 0.73 0.67–0.80 7–13, 14–17, ≥18 0.77

EPDS indicates Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; PDSS_SF, 7-item Short Postpartum Depression Screening Scale; PHQ-9, depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire.