Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Nov;46(6):713–723. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00949-8

Table 2.

Two-level mixed effects logistic regression models predicting therapist turnover

Predictor Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
B SE B SE B SE
Intercept − .530* .251 − .528* .250 − .526* .249
Organization size (# therapists) − .009 .017 − .009 .016 − .010 .016
Independent contractor employee (ref = salaried) − .855 .524 − .865 .518 − .911 .522
Other employee (e.g., intern) (ref = salaried) .574 .745 .573 .751 .534 .720
Full-time employee (ref = part-time) − .512 .413 − .520 .407 − .559 .376
Emotional exhaustion .012 .013 .012 .013 .011 .013
Depersonalization − .049 .028 − .049 .028 − .058 .030
Personal accomplishment − .038 .023 − .039 .023 − .039 .024
Tenure with organization − .081 .062 − .081 .063 − .081 .059
Gender (referent = female) − .258 .416 − .268 .415 − .321 .419
Financial strain (higher score = higher strain) .110* .055 .111* .055 .111* .054
EBP initiative participation − .094 .267 − .065 .256
Financial strain × EBP initiative participation − .276* .136

N = 247, k = 28

*

p < .05