Table 4.
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 7.4a | 3.8 | 14.2a | 1.6 | 10.8a | |
3.62 ± 1.89 | ||||||
C2 | p < 0.005a | 21.5a | 1.6 | 13.7a | 1.1 | |
5.42 ± 1.61 | ||||||
C3 | p = 0.06 | p < 0.0001a | 28.4a | 1 | 21.8a | |
2.28 ± 0.71 | ||||||
C4 | p < 0.0001a | p = 0.52 | p < 0.0001a | 20.0a | 1 | |
6.38 ± 0.33 | ||||||
C5 | p = 0.54 | p < 0.0001a | p = 1 | p < 0.0001a | 16.4a | |
2.46 ± 1.71 | ||||||
C6 | p < 0.001a | p = 0.95 | p < 0.0001a | p = 1 | p < 0.0001a | |
6.45 ± 0.13 |
The values in the first column under the cluster number show the mean ± SD for each cluster. The p values (below the diagonal) were all determined using a multiple comparison of the output of a one-way ANOVA using the Bonferroni method to provide the adjustment to compensate for multiple comparisons. Values above the diagonal are 1 − log(p) indicating the full range of significance values.
aValues reached significance level <0.05.