Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;10:101. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0782-1

Fig. 5. Effects of ZD7288 and 8-Br-cAMP on the synaptic ultrastructure in the PFC and Hip under SPS&S procedure.

Fig. 5

ac The PSD (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 9) = 4.416, p = 0.046; Post-hoc test: SPS&S + ZD7288: p = 0.028, SPS&S + 8-Br-cAMP: p = 0.338), curvature of synaptic interface (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 9) = 6.005, p = 0.022; Post-hoc test: SPS&S + ZD7288: p = 0.026, SPS&S + 8-Br-cAMP: p = 0.999) and width of synaptic cleft (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 9) = 5.836, p = 0.024; Post-hoc test: SPS&S + ZD7288: p = 0.014, SPS&S + 8-Br-cAMP: p = 0.277) in the PFC. gi The PSD (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 9) = 3.002, p = 0.100; Post-hoc test: SPS&S + ZD7288: p = 0.086, SPS&S + 8-Br-cAMP: p = 0.148), curvature of synaptic interface (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 9) = 0.109, p = 0.898; Post-hoc test: SPS&S + ZD7288: p = 0.863, SPS&S + 8-Br-cAMP: p = 0.986) and width of synaptic cleft (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 9) = 1.901, p = 0.205; Post-hoc test: SPS&S + ZD7288: p = 0.162, SPS&S + 8-Br-cAMP: p = 0.872) in the Hip. df, jl Synaptic ultrastructure in PFC (df) and Hip (jl) under ×10,000 magnification. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 was expressed statistically significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 compared with control group.