Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;10:5159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62096-7

Table 2.

Results of the linear regression analysis of the association between the thickness of Bruch’s membrane (µm) and axial length.

Region Bruch’s membrane thickness (µm) Standardized Regression Coefficient beta Non- Standardized Regression Coefficient B 95% Confidence Interval of B P-Value*
Secondary High Myopia (Congenital Glaucoma)
Posterior pole 1.9 ± 0.6 −0.93 −0.27 −0.39, −0.14 0.003
Midpoint posterior pole and equator 1.7 ± 0.6 −0.79 −0.22 −0.42, −0.02 0.035
Equator 1.8 ± 0.5 −0.84 −0.21 −0.37, −0.06 0.017
Pre-Ora serrata 1.7 ± 0.7 −0.10 −0.03 −0.42, 0.35 0.83
No Secondary High Myopia (No Congenital Glaucoma)
Posterior pole 2.6 ± 0.9 0.11 0.01 −0.01, 0.03 0.37
Midpoint posterior pole and equator 2.6 ± 1.0 0.08 0.02 −0.05, 0.10 0.51
Equator 2.5 ± 1.0 0.21 0.06 −0.01, 0.13 0.09
Pre-Ora serrata 2.6 ± 1.2 −0.09 −0.03 −0.12, 0.05 0.45
Primary High Myopia
Posterior pole 2.7 ± 1.0 0.13 0.05 −0.07, 0.17 0.43
Midpoint posterior pole and equator 2.6 ± 1.0 0.02 0.01 −0.12, 0.13 0.91
Equator 2.7 ± 1.1 0.10 0.04 −0.09, 0.17 0.54
Pre-Ora serrata 2.6 ± 1.0 −0.12 −0.05 −0.18, 0.08 0.45
Non-Highly Myopic Group
Posterior pole 2.5 ± 0.8 −0.21 −0.18 −0.52, 0.15 0.28
Midpoint posterior pole and equator 2.5 ± 1.0 0.03 0.04 −0.39, 0.46 0.87
Equator 2.3 ± 0.7 0.10 0.08 −0.24. 0.41 0.60
Pre-Ora serrata 2.7 ± 1.4 −0.09 −0.14 −0.75, 0.48 0.65

*Statistical significance of the association between axial length and Bruch’s membrane thickness.