Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;3(1):e1083. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1083

Table 2.

Univariate association of various lumbar spinal phenotypes on T2‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultra‐short time‐to echo (UTE) MRI to that of spinopelvic parameters

Lumbar phenotypes on MRI
Disc degeneration (black disc) Disc displacement Modic changes UTE disc signa Combined disc displacement, Modic changes, and UTE disc sign
Spinopelvic parameters

No

n = 26

Yes

n = 69

No

n = 17

Yes

n = 78

No

n = 45

Yes

n = 50

No

n = 59

Yes

n = 36

No

n = 72

Yes

n = 23

Pelvic incidence (degrees)

43.5 ± 11.0

45.7 ± 11.8

P = .420

47.4 ± 12.7

44.6 ± 11.4

P = .366

46.8 ± 12.0

43.5 ± 11.1

P = .171

46.4 ± 12.5

43.2 ± 9.9

P = .228

46.1 ± 11.9

41.9 ± 1.1

P = .127

Sacral slope (degrees)

27.6 ± 6.8

28.5 ± 7.3

P = .566

32.2 ± 8.1

27.4 ± 6.68

P = .010*

3.0 ± 7.9

26.7 ± 5.99

P = .025*

28.2 ± 6.9

28.6 ± 7.6

P = .991

29.1 ± 7.5

25.4 ± 5.3

P = .028*

Pelvic tilt (degrees) 9.9 ± 9.4

12.2 ± 7.3

P = .207

1.3 ± 11.9

11.9 ± 6.9

P = .460

1.8 ± 8.5

12.2 ± 7.5

P = .410

11.7 ± 8.3

11.4 ± 7.5

P = .890

11.4 ± 8.2

12.0 ± 7.3

P = .763

Lumbar lordosis (degrees) 28.0 ± 11.2

28.8 ± 12.5

P = .762

35.6 ± 1.0

27.0 ± 12.1

P = .007*

31.5 ± 11.8

25.8 ± 11.9

P = .021*

3.0 ± 11.6

26.2 ± 12.8

P = .141

3.2 ± 11.9

23.6 ± 11.6

P = .023*

Lumbar Lordosis/pelvic incidence index .64 ± .22

.65 ± .29

P = .940

.79 ± .27

.62 ± .26

P = .012*

.69 ± .26

.60 ± .28

P = .116

.66 ± .24

.62 ± .32

P = .521

.66 ± .26

.58 ± .30

P = .196

Note: Endplate abnormalities represent structural endplate changes/defects involving the bony/cartilaginous endplates. The value of “n” represents the sample size of subjects. Values are presented as mean and SD.

a

Ultra‐short time‐to echo (UTE) MRI to that of spinopelvic parameters.

*P < .05.