Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD001466. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001466.pub3

Comparison 2. Surgery vs cervical collar in cervical radiculopathy.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Radicular pain (current‐VAS) at presentation 1 54 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐2.0 [‐14.20, 10.20]
2 Radicular pain (current‐VAS) at 3 months following treatment 1 54 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐21.0 [‐33.32, ‐8.68]
3 Radicular pain (current‐VAS) at 1 year following treatment 1 54 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐5.0 [‐18.84, 8.84]
4 Radicular pain (worst‐VAS) at presentation 1 54 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.0 [‐6.16, 14.16]
5 Radicular pain (worst‐VAS) at 3 months following treatment 1 54 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐21.0 [‐36.89, ‐5.11]
6 Radicular pain (worst‐VAS) at 1 year following treatment 1 54 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐10.0 [‐30.79, 10.79]
7 Paraesthesia at 4 months following treatment 1 54 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.19, 1.61]
8 Paraesthesia at 16 months following treatment 1 52 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.38 [0.45, 4.16]
9 Sensory loss at 4 months following treatment 1 54 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.28 [0.09, 0.92]
10 Sensory loss at 16 months following treatment 1 52 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.14, 1.90]