Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD001423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001423.pub3

Bauer 1999.

Methods Number of sites unknown 
 Randomization: unclear 
 Blinding: patients, providers
Participants Geographic regions: Germany/Italy 
 Study setting: community 
 N = 101 
 Baseline IPSS: Sabal extract 9.6; placebo 8.9 
 Baseline prostate volume: Sabal extract 34.5 cc; placebo 31.7 cc 
 Mean age (range): 66.1 (NR (no record)) years 
 Race: White 
 Diagnostic criteria: confirmed diagnosis of BPH with enlargement of the prostate, symptoms of obstruction and a maximum flow of < 15 mL/s
Interventions Control: matching placebo 
 Treatment: Sabal extract (LG166/S) 160 mg twice daily 
 Study duration: 6 months 
 Lost to follow‐up: n = 3(?)
Outcomes IPSS symptom score 
 Peak urine flow 
 Prostate volume 
 Sexual function 
 Dropouts due to side effects: n = 0
Notes Exclusions: patients treated for BPH within 1 month of the trial start; prostate cancer; acute urinary tract infection; chronic prostatitis; neurogenic bladder.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "double blinded"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk per protocol outcomes
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk outcomes not selectively reported
Other bias Low risk arms were assessed equally