Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD001423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001423.pub3

Carraro 1996.

Methods Multisite study 
 Randomization: computer‐generated randomization code 
 Blinding: patients, providers
Participants Geographic region: Nine European countries 
 Study setting: community 
 N = 1098 
 Baseline IPSS: Permixon® 15.7; finasteride 15.7 
 Baseline prostate volume: Permixon® 43.0 cc; finasteride 44.0 cc 
 Mean age (range): 64.5 (49 to 88) years 
 Race: White 
 Diagnostic criteria: BPH diagnosed by digital rectal exam (DRE); International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > 6; maximum urinary flow between 4 to 15 mL/s (with a urine volume at least 150 mL, and a postvoid residue of < 200 mL); prostate size > 25 mL; serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/mL (prostates less than or equal to 60 mL) or 15 ng/mL (prostates > 60 mL); good mental and physical condition.
Interventions Control: finasteride 5 mg (PROSCAR®) + placebo (morning) and two placebos (evening) 
 Treatment: Permixon® 160 mg + placebo twice daily 
 Study duration: 26 weeks 
 Lost to follow‐up: 13.4%
Outcomes Symptom improvement ‐ IPSS symptom score (0 to 35 points) 
 Quality of life score (0 to 6 points) 
 Sexual function score (0 to 20 points) 
 Peak urine flow 
 Mean urine flow 
 Total voided volume 
 Bladder residual volume 
 Prostate size (volume) 
 Serum PSA 
 Dropouts due to side effects: 4% (Permixon® n = 28, finasteride n = 14)
Notes Exclusions: Prostate cancer; bladder disease; abnormal liver function; diuretics or drugs with antiandrogenic or alpha‐receptor properties in the preceding 3 months; urogenital infections; disease potentially affecting micturition.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk adequate
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "double‐blind"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk adequate
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk adequate
Other bias Low risk adequate