Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 25;17(5):1481. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051481

Table 3.

Association between concurrent PM2.5 and the incidence rate of lung cancer for females.

Female Baseline Rate = 24.17
Model 1 Model 2
Variables β 95% CI β 95% CI
PM2.5 2.07% *** (0.83%, 3.31%) 2.48% *** (1.24%, 4.14%)
Log 0.19 *** (0.11, 0.26) 0.23 *** (0.15, 0.31)
Lat 0.54 *** (0.45, 0.63) 0.52 *** (0.42, 0.61)
Year 2007 0.93 (−3.84, 5.69) 0.82 (−3.83, 5.48)
Year 2008 0.66 (−4.06, 5.37) 0.39 (−4.22, 5.01)
Year 2009 2.86 (−1.28, 6.99) 2.58 (−1.47, 6.63)
Year 2010 3.85 ** (0.04, 7.65) 3.15 * (−0.59, 6.88)
Year 2011 4.78 ** (1.03, 8.53) 4.05 ** (0.34, 7.76)
Year 2012 6.5 *** (2.77, 10.23) 5.8 *** (2.08, 9.51)
Year 2013 6.18 *** (2.52, 9.84) 5.47 *** (1.87, 9.08)
Year 2014 7.04 *** (3.42, 10.66) 6.18 *** (2.61, 9.75)
Finance 0.02 (−0.11, 0.16)
Education −0.44 (−1.02, 0.14)
Construction −0.76 *** (−1.01, −0.52)
Population 0.01 (−0.01, 0.02)
Urban-rural 3.26 *** (1.68, 4.85)

* for p < 0.1, ** for p < 0.05, and *** for p < 0.01. With a 10 μg/m3 change in PM2.5, the change in the incidence rate relative to its baseline = (10 × coefficient for PM2.5)/baseline incidence rate (i.e., 24.17 per 100,000 people).