Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 6;17(5):1728. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051728

Table 2.

Smoking prevalence and treatment among urban and rural clinics.

Rural Urban
N % N % Diff. 95% CI Chi-sq p
Total Patients * 50,250 424,424
Assessment 47,196 93.9 375,350 88.4 5.5 5.3, 5.7 1382.1 <0.0001
Smoking ** 9751 20.7 52,369 13.9 6.7 6.3, 7.1 1504.4 <0.0001
Total Smokers 9751 52,369
Any Treatment *** 934 9.6 13,526 25.8 −16.2 −16.9, −15.5 1214.5 <0.0001
Brief Advice 310 3.2 10,139 19.4 −16.2 −16.7, −15.7 1537.3 <0.0001
Medication 639 6.6 3929 7.5 −0.9 −1.5, −0.403 10.7 0.001
Additional Counseling Offer 161 1.7 1377 2.6 −1.0 −1.3, −0.68 32.2 <0.0001
Additional Counseling Referral **** 16 0.16 191 0.36 −0.20 −0.302, −0.099 9.4 0.002

* Out of 73 clinics at rural location, five clinics (6.8%) were cancer clinics. Out of 693 clinics at urban location, 40 clinics (5.8%) were cancer clinics. ** For patients without smoking status assessment, if they received any smoking cessation treatment, they would be identified as smokers. Therefore, smoking prevalence in rural and urban clinics were calculated for patients who were assessed and documented as smokers or received any type of smoking cessation treatment (n = 47,220 and 375,561). *** Any treatment is defined as patients receiving medication, brief advice given, or additional counseling was referred. **** For rural clinics, additional counseling referral (n = 16) consisted of engagement in Quitline referral (n = 10), QuitGuide or QuitStart app (n = 2), SmokefreeTXT (n = 2), and already referred at time of visit (n = 2). For urban clinics, additional counseling referral (n = 191) consisted of engagement in Quitline referral (n = 75), QuitGuide or QuitStart app (n = 14), SmokefreeTXT (n = 43), Quitline and app referral (n = 1), Quitline and SmokefreeTXT (n = 8), SmokefreeTXT and app (n = 3), and already referred at time of visit (n = 47).