Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;17(5):1808. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051808

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population at baseline across 11 countries, 2014 (n = 23,805).

Characteristics Bhutan Ethiopia Ghana Indonesia Kenya Mozambique Nepal 1 1 Nepal 2 1 South Sudan Tanzania Uganda Zambia
Total living in program area 2 95,111 454,255 469,964 174,547 816,934 1,267,424 460,873 521,548 487,105 996,535 2,033,442 541,063
Total sampled 751 2167 2112 2039 1953 1888 2979 2492 2131 2177 2055 1061
Female headed household (%) 3 214 (25) 490 (23) 274 (17) 197 (10) 428 (23) 451 (24) 554 (16) 372 (15) 736 (33) 427 (20) 473 (23) 282 (26)
Households with any person with disability (%) 3 57 (7) 53 (2) 226 (12) 89 (5) 227 (11) 71 (4) 410 (10) 226 (9) 187 (8) 353 (17) 220 (12) 98 (9)
Households with any elderly (%) 3,4 459 (62) 849 (39) 1431 (70) 978 (48) 1101 (56) 461 (24) 1749 (60) 1572 (65) 1259 (61) 1071 (49) 956 (49) 421 (39)
Households wealth quintiles 5
  Lowest two quintiles (%) 163 (44) 851 (39) 773 (36) 1046 (47) 1384 (68) 519 (28) 1990 (57) 1269 (51) 86 (4) 551 (23) 790 (40) 429 (40)
  Middle quintile (%) 121 (33) 449 (21) 466 (22) 530 (27) 288 (17) 440 (23) 761 (32) 976 (39) 433 (20) 925 (43) 412 (20) 229 (22)
  Highest two quintiles (%) 86 (23) 867 (40) 873 (41) 463 (25) 281 (16) 929 (49) 228 (11) 247 (10) 1612 (76) 701 (33) 853 (40) 403 (38)
Number of HH members, mean (SD) 4.6 (0.08) 4.8 (0.05) 10 (0.16) 4.1 (0.04) 8 (0.16) 4.2 (0.06) 6.8 (0.06) 7.1 (0.08) 7.3 (0.09) 7.3 (0.1) 7.9 (0.31) 5.4 (0.09)

1 There were two separately funded program areas in Nepal, which we call Nepal 1 and Nepal 2. 2 Population size of the entire program catchment areas at baseline. 3 Sampling weights were used so the percentages are representative of the program areas. 4 Any persons ≥50. 5 These the percent of people in the poorest two wealth quintile based on national wealth assets. HH—households; SD—standard deviation.