Table 2.
Change in coverage of basic sanitation, shown by program area.
| Program Area | Baseline Sanitation Prevalence (95% CI) | Final Follow-up Sanitation Prevalence (95% CI) | Baseline to Final Difference (95% CI) | Estimated Population that Gained Toilet Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bhutan | 62% (58%, 65%) | 92% (90%, 94%) | +30% (26%, 34%) | 28,835 |
| Ethiopia | 19% (17%, 20%) | 95% (95%, 96%) | +77% (75%, 79%) | 422,469 |
| Ghana | 8% (7%, 10%) | 36% (34%, 38%) | +28% (25%, 30%) | 146,331 |
| Indonesia | 62% (60%, 65%) | 95% (94%, 96%) | +33% (30%, 35%) | 56,309 |
| Kenya | 19% (17%, 21%) | 68% (66%, 69%) | +49% (46%, 52%) | 446,967 |
| Mozambique | 21% (19%, 23%) | 61% (59%, 63%) | +40% (37%, 43%) | 608,361 |
| Nepal 1 | 42% (41%, 44%) | 99% (99%, 100%) | +57% (55%, 59%) | 283,219 |
| Nepal 2 | 27% (26%, 29%) | 94% (94%, 95%) | +67% (65%, 69%) | 375,077 |
| South Sudan | 14% (13%, 15%) | 15% (14%, 16%) 1 | +1% (−1%, 3%) 1 | 6452 1 |
| Tanzania | 31% (29%, 33%) | 65% (63%, 67%) | +34% (31%, 37%) | 390,957 |
| Uganda | 15% (13%, 17%) | 78% (77%, 79%) | +63% (61%, 66%) | 1,480,076 |
| Zambia | 11% (9%, 13%) | 91% (90%, 92%) | +80% (78%, 83%) | 555,658 |
1 The final follow-up in South Sudan was after one year (i.e., round 2). CI—confident interval.