Table A3.

The difference-in-difference of basic sanitation coverage comparing vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups.

Country	Coverage Change for Female vs. Male Headed HHs	Coverage Change for HHs with Elderly Members vs. No Elderly Members	Coverage Change for HHs With Disabled Members vs. No Disabled Members	Coverage Change for HHs in Lowest Quintiles vs. Highest Two Quintiles
Bhutan	6% (−4%, 15%)	−7% (−15%, 2%)	1% (−14%, 17%)	35% (23%, 48%)
Ethiopia	6% (1%, 11%)	2% (−1%, 6%)	5% (−6%, 16%)	−9% (−13%, −5%)
Ghana	−11% (−18%, −4%)	0% (−5%, 5%)	10% (−2%, 21%)	−9% (−16%, −2%)
Indonesia	−3% (−11%, 5%)	−4% (−9%, 1%)	−1% (−12%, 11%)	60% (56%, 64%)
Kenya	−5% (−11%, 1%)	1% (−4%, 6%)	−7% (−17%, 3%)	15% (8%, 22%)
Mozambique	−6% (−12%, 1%)	−1% (−7%, 6%)	−9% (−53%, 35%)	27% (20%, 33%)
Nepal 1	−31% (−36%, −26%)	2% (−2%, 6%)	−23% (−29%, −17%)	10% (3%, 17%)
Nepal 2	−9% (−15%, −3%)	3% (−2%, 7%)	12% (4%, 20%)	−11% (−18%, −5%)
South Sudan *	−8% (−12%, −4%)	−6% (−10%, −2%)	14% (6%, 21%)	17% (10%, 24%)
Tanzania	19% (12%, 25%)	2% (−4%, 8%)	6% (−9%, 21%)	10% (2%, 18%)
Uganda	−3% (−9%, 2%)	3% (−2%, 8%)	1% (−8%, 9%)	−17% (−22%, −12%)
Zambia	−6% (−11%, 0%)	5% (1%, 10%)	1% (−10%, 11%)	−12% (−17%, −7%)

* South Sudan’s endline was round 2, rather than round 4.