Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;17(5):1539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051539

Table 2.

Description of exposure and outcome variables of study sample, ELSA-Brasil 2012–2014.

Character Women Men
n (%) n (%)
Total (7503) 3998 (53.3) 3505 (46.7)
Exposure to Occupational Stress
Demand–control model
1st tertile (low score) 1192 (29.8) ** 1350 (38.5) **
2nd tertile 1243 (31.1) 1146 (32.7)
3rd tertile 1563 (39.1) 1009 (28.8)
Social support
1st tertile (high score) 761 (19.0) ** 855 (24.4) **
2nd tertile 1791 (44.8) 1583 (45.2)
3rd tertile 1446 (36.2) 1067 (30.4)
Effort–reward model
1st tertile (low score) 1222 (30.6) ** 1172 (33.4) **
2nd tertile 1291 (32.3) 1192 (34.0)
3rd tertile 1485 (37.1) 1141 (32.6)
Overcommitment
1st tertile (low score) 1064 (26.6) * 987 (28.2) *
2nd tertile 1660 (41.5) 1480 (42.2)
3rd tertile 1274 (31.9) 1038 (29.6)
Simultaneous Exposure to
Occupational Stress
DC and low SS present 997 (24.9) ** 584 (16.7) **
ERI and OC present 838 (21.0) ** 634 (18.1) **
DC and ERI present 1029 (25.7) ** 667 (19.0) **
Glycemic Alterations Outcomes
Normal 3248 (81.2) * 2944 (84.0) *
Prediabetes maintenance 256 (6.4) 185 (5.3)
Incident prediabetes 405 (10.1) 298 (8.5)
Incident diabetes 89 (2.2) 78 (2.2)

DC: demand–control model. SS: social support. ERI: effort–reward imbalance model. OC: overcommitment. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 in the Chi-squared test for gender difference.