Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 22;2020(3):CD000475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000475.pub4

Korell 1994.

Methods Unit of randomisation: participant
 Method of randomisation: unknown
 Time of randomisation: unknown
 Blinding: unknown
Participants Patients undergoing myomectomy by laparoscopy
 N = 38
 Dropouts: not known
 Myomectomy details unknown
Indication for surgery: fibroids
 Pre‐existing adhesions: no
 Microsurgery: no
Age, mean, SD: unknown
Location: Germany
 Timing and duration: unknown
Interventions Oxidised regenerated cellulose applied to myomectomy incision(s) vs Gortex applied to myomectomy site(s)
Other adjuvants used: none
Second‐look laparoscopy
  1. Timing: unknown

  2. Surgeon unaware: unknown

  3. Adhesiolysis: unknown

Outcomes Adhesions at second‐look laparoscopy
  1. Incidence (per participant)

  2. Severity: graded as none, mild, and severe


Adverse effects: unknown
Pregnancy: unknown
Notes Power calculations not stated
 Documentation not stated
 No source of funding stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated within study
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated within study
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated within study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated within study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of whether withdrawals or dropouts occurred during the study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Data presented as numbers of cases and percentages. P values stated for significant outcomes. No omission of outcomes and no subsets of data. However, no pre‐published protocol identified
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified