Table 5.
Study | Age of sample (y) | Exposure of C v. E | Deficit on A | Deficit on B | Correl. with TCPy | Correl. with AChE | Correl. with BuChE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present | 48–54 | TCPy: 5.5–6.3 (C) v. 12 (T&E) v. 21 μg/g creat. (A) BuChE: 0.86 (A) v. 0.94 (T&E) U/ml * | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Farahat et al. (2003) | 42 | AChE: 108 v. 87 U/ml | Yes | Yes | • | No | • |
Abdel Rasoul et al. (2008) | 9–18 | AChE: 283 v. 240 IU/L | Yes | Yes | • | Yes | • |
Rohlman et al. (2016) | 16–17 | TCPy:<1559 (C) v. > 1.6 ng/g creat. | Yes | Yes | • | • | • |
Ismail et al. (2017a) | 15 | No comparisons | • | • | Yes (B) | Yes (A) | No |
Ismail et al. (2017b) | 15 | 33–42 % of applicators had BuChE depression vs. 5–13 % of non-applicators | No | Yes | • | • | Yes |
Notes: C= control; T = technician; E =engineer; A =applicator.
“•” indicates tests were not reported in the article. Data rounded to nearest whole number to facilitate visual inspection of the results.
No difference in AChE between applicators and technicians or engineers. 2017a = JTEH article. 2017b = PLOSone article. Creat. = creatinine