Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 17;2012(10):CD001405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001405.pub3

Comparison 5. Oestrogen + other treatments versus other treatments.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number with incontinence (women's observations) 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 oestrogen + PFMT vs PFMT 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Vaginal oestrogen + TVT vs TVT 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Number with incontinence not improved (women's observations) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 oestrogen + PPA vs PPA 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Number of pad changes over 24 hours 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 oestrogen + PPA vs PPA 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Number of voids over 24 hours 2   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 oestrogen + PPA vs PPA 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.2 detrusitol + vaginal oestrogen vs detrusitol m 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Pad test weights 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.1 oestrogen + PPA vs PPA 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Adverse effects 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1 oestrogen + PPA vs PPA 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6.2 oestrogen + PFMT vs PFMT 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]