Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 17;2012(10):CD001405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001405.pub3

Comparison 6. Different types of oestrogen.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number with incontinence not improved (women's observations) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 oestradiol ring vs oestriol pessary 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Number of women with nocturia 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 oestradiol ring vs oestriol pessary 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Number of women with dysuria 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 oestradiol ring vs oestriol pessary 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Number of women with urgency 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 oestradiol ring vs oestriol pessary 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.2 oestrogen cream vs vaginal oestrogen + progesterone 0   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Number of women with frequency 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.1 oestradiol ring vs oestriol pessary 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.2 oestrogen cream vs vaginal oestrogen + progesterone 0   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Number of adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1 oestradiol ring vs oestriol pessary 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]