Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 17;2012(10):CD001405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001405.pub3

Rufford 2003 S.

Methods Double‐blind RCT, placebo controlled 
 Power calculation 
 Duration of study: 6/12 
 F/U at 1/12, 3/12 and 6/12
Participants 40 post‐menopausal women 
 Inclusion criteria: 'urge syndrome', not menstruated for > 12 months or if hysterectomised if oestradiol levels < 150 pmol/L 
 Exclusion criteria: on medication for 'urge syndrome', diabetes mellitus or insipidus, diuretics, HRT within last 3 months or hormone implant or intramuscular hormone injection within previous year, endometrial thickness > 4 mm or abnormal endometrium on histology, UTI or haematuria, pelvic mass, urogenital prolapse, other contra‐indication to oestrogen therapy 
 losses to follow up: A: 2, B: 1 
 Baseline characteristics: BMI A 26.5 (4.3) B 29.0 (6.72); previous hysterectomy A 6 (30%) B 6 (30%); detrusor instability A 7 (35%) B 15 (75%); age at menopause A 46.55, B 47.75 (6.34) years
Interventions Group A (n=20): 17 beta oestradiol 25mg implant subcutaneously 
 Group B (n=20): placebo implant subcutaneously
Outcomes Outcomes measured by frequency/volume chart, King's Healthcare Quality of Life Questionnaire, urinary symptom questionnaire, visual analogue scale of symptom severity, uroflowmetry, video cystourethrography, serum oestradiol levels, endometrial thickness 
 definition of cure: complete absence of a symptom that had been present at the beginning of the study 
 Urgency urinary incontinence not cured: A: 8/15, B: 10/14 
 Stress incontinence not cured: A: 7/10, B: 5/7 
 Incontinent episodes in 24 hours (n, mean, SD): A: 16, 2 (5), B: 19, 1 (2) 
 Number of micturitions in 24 hours (n, mean, SD): A: 16, 9 (3), B: 19, 9 (3) 
 Adverse effects: A: 5 hysterectomy, 9 irregular vaginal bleeding, 1 angina (was felt not related to study medication), 4 breast tenderness, 8 UTIs 
 B: 1 breast tenderness, 11 UTIs
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk no description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk no description
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blind
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 40 women randomised