Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 17;2012(10):CD001405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001405.pub3

Walter 1990 S.

Methods Double‐blind placebo controlled RCT, randomisation into two treatment groups by block randomisation using random numbers Duration of study: 12/52; assessment at 4/52, 8/52, 12/52
Participants 29 post‐menopausal women 
 Inclusion criteria: stress urinary incontinence documented by pad‐weighing test, >1year post‐menopausal including iatrogenic menopause, no oestrogen treatment < 2/12 prior to study,patients expected to comply with protocol including treatment on outpatient basis, stable cystometry, no evidence of obstruction 
 Exclusion criteria: neurological disease and senility, diabetes mellitus, liver dysfunction, previous cancer of breast or uterus, hypertension (diastolic > 100 mmHg), concomitant treatment with drugs affecting the lower urinary tract
Interventions Group A (n=15): placebo for 4/52 (period 1), then phenylpropanolamine (PPA) 50mg twice daily + placebo for 4/52 (period 2), then PPA 50mg twice daily + oestriol 4mg daily for 4/52 (period 3) 
 Group B (n=14): placebo for 4/52 (period 1), then oestriol 4mg daily + placebo for 4/52 (period 2), then PPA 50mg twice daily + oestriol 4mg daily for 4/52 (period 3)
Outcomes Subjective drug preference, 3‐day urinary diary, incontinence, median voiding frequency, mean number of leakage episodes, pad test, vaginal cytology, urine cultures, side effects, heart rate, BP
Notes Adverse events: 5 in placebo period, 6 in PPA period, 5 in oestriol period, 7 in PPA + oestriol period 
 Losses to follow up: 1 during PPA period, 1 after period 2 of study (not specified which group)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation into two treatment groups by block randomisation using random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation into two treatment groups by block randomisation using random numbers
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Women were blind to treatment
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk no description