Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Stem Cell Res. 2018 Dec 20;34:101365. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2018.101365

Table 2:

Characterization and validation

Classification Test Result Data
Morphology Photography All lines exhibit normal morphology Figure 1A, Supplementary Figure 1A
Phenotype Qualitative analysis All lines exhibit expression of self-renewal markers NANOG, OCT3/4, & SOX2 Figure 1A, Supplementary Figure 1A
Quantitative analysis All lines were greater than 90% positive for OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG Figure 1B, Supplementary Figure 1B
Genotype G-banding Karyotype 46,XX or 46,XY Normal Karyotype, resolution 425–600 nm Figure 1A, Supplementary Figure 1A
Identity STR analysis STR analysis defines profile for each line, confirms clonality and purity to 95–98% confidence Available with authors
15 loci tested, all matched appropriate source fibroblasts
Mutation analysis (IF APPLICABLE) Sequencing Not Applicable Not Applicable
Southern Blot OR WGS Not Applicable Not Applicable
Microbiology and virology Mycoplasma Negative Supplementary Figure 2
Differentiation potential Directed differentiation Trilineage differentiation (StemCell Technologies) and qPCR verification, all lines express markers of each germ layer Figure 1D, Supplementary Figure 1C
Donor screening (OPTIONAL) HIV 1 + 2 Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C N/A N/A
Genotype additional info (OPTIONAL) Blood group genotyping N/A N/A
HLA tissue typing N/A N/A