Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 15;159(4):669–676. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1876-3

Table 1.

Comparison of the FTD multiplex RT-PCR assay with monoplex real-time RT-PCR as the reference. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa value are shown

Pathogen No. of samples (monoplex RT-PCR/FTD assay) FTD PCR performance
+/+ +/− −/+ −/− Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Kappa
Adenovirus 9 2 5 353 81.8 98.6 64.3 99.4 0.71
Human bocavirus 19 7 11 332 73.1 96.8 63.3 97.9 0.65
Coronavirus NL63 0 1 1 367 na 99.7 na 99.7 na
Coronavirus OC43 5 6 1 357 45.5 99.7 83.3 98.3 0.58
Coronavirus 229E 5 2 2 360 71.4 99.4 71.4 99.4 0.71
Enterovirus/parechovirus1 3 1 4 361 75 98.9 42.9 99.7 0.54
Human metapneumovirus 38 2 8 321 95 97.6 82.6 99.4 0.87
Influenza virus A, universal2 8 2 2 357 80 99.4 80 99.4 0.79
Influenza virus B 0 0 0 369 na 100 na 100 na
Parainfluenza virus 1 4 4 0 361 50 100 100 98.9 0.66
Parainfluenza virus 2 1 3 1 364 25 99.7 50 99.2 0.33
Parainfluenza virus 3 6 1 1 361 85.7 99.7 85.7 99.7 0.85
Parainfluenza virus 4 1 0 1 367 100 99.7 50 100 0.67
Respiratory syncytial virus 65 5 3 296 92.9 99 95.6 98.3 0.93
Rhinovirus 30 1 13 325 96.8 96.2 69.8 99.7 0.79

na: not applicable

1FTD assay does not distinguish between enterovirus and parechovirus

2FTD assay does not subtype influenza virus A