Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 25;171(7):1055–1061. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1673-0

Table 3.

Health-related cost of care in UK pounds by hospital readmission status

RSV (n = 20) Other respiratory (n = 30) Non-respiratory (n = 108) Overall p value Post hoc tests of significant pairs p for post hoc comparison
Hospital admission 10,936 (31,928) [1,895, 956–142,584] 1,705 (1,073) [1,097, 478–5,887] 230 (562) [0, 0–3,304] p = 0.019 RSV vs non-resp 0.06
RSV vs other resp 0.10
Respiratory admission 8,878 (31,385) [1,123, 956–142,051] 1,211 (506) [1,087, 478–3,117] 0 (0) [0, 0–0] p = 0.09 RSV vs other resp 0.09
OPD visit 931 (885) [695,126–4,092] 900 (916) [530, 0–3,929] 579 (435) [501, 0–2,186] p = 0.017 RSV vs non-resp 0.05
RSV vs other resp 0.89
Respiratory OPD visit 95 (221) [0, 0–882] 180 (301) [0, 0–1,182] 25 (157) [0, 0–1,542] p = 0.56 RSV vs non-resp n/a
RSV vs other resp
A&E visit 284 (158) [224, 71–606] 273 (232) [227, 71–1,170] 52 (102) [0, 0–694] p = 0.003 RSV vs non-resp 0.03
RSV vs other resp 0.93
Respiratory A&E visit 149 (69) [137, 46–296] 178 (148) [149, 0–616] 13 (61) [0, 0–585] p = 0.38 RSV vs non-resp n/a3
RSV vs other resp 0.38
Prescription 74 (102) [42, 1.7–426] 118 (249) [38, 7.6–1,109] 29 (28) [21, 0–125] p = 0.001 RSV vs non-resp 0.04
RSV vs other resp 0.22
Respiratory prescription 17 (22) [14, 0–90] 63 (195) [16, 0–1,070] 5 (12) [1.4, 0–109] p = 0.05 RSV vs non-resp 0.21
RSV vs other resp 0.11
Total costs 12,505 (32,137) [2,939, 1,648–144,034] 3,356 (2,121) [2,410, 1,279–9,111] 1,178 (940) [900, 32–5,066] p < 0.001 RSV vs non-resp <0.001
RSV vs other resp 0.005
Total respiratory admission costs 9,273 (31,409) [1,570, 1,088–142,498] 1,815 (1,192) [1,472, 515–5,896] 80 (186) [0, 0–1,565] p = 0.011 RSV vs non-resp 0.05
RSV vs other resp 0.12
Total respiratory minus index respiratory admission 1,342 (3,239) [459, 0–14,858] 647 (977) [359, 0–4,940] 80 (186) [0, 0–1,565] p = 0.016 RSV vs non-resp 0.06
RSV vs other resp 0.33

Data are demonstrated as mean (SD) [median, range]. All analyses use a generalised linear model with gamma distribution and identity link. In the final column: for statistical significance, p must be less than 0.017 to account for multiple testing. For 97/128 subjects in the ‘non-respiratory’ group, the total cost was zero and so the model would not permit this group to be included. Hence, the comparison RSV vs other respiratory only has been included for this variable. Mean costs should be used in any calculations to obtain total costs and not medians