Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 7;2010(7):CD000336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000336.pub2

Borenstein 2003.

Methods RCT (randomized by patient)
Participants outpatient hypertension clinic run by clinical pharmacists (patients recruited from two main offices of a group medical practice of general internists and internal medicine subspecialists affiliated with a large community hospital) 
 patients with uncontrolled hypertension 
 patients ‐ 1272 (635 intervention, 637 control) 
 health professional (delivering intervention) ‐ not clear 
 practice ‐ 2 
 no unit of analysis error
Interventions targeted towards PATIENTS 
 pharmacist assessed patients' blood pressure, medication regimen, medication adherence, adverse drug effects and lifestyle habits and provided individualized patient education regarding dietary and life‐style modifications during initial and follow‐up visits vs usual care 
 targeted towards HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 
 pharmacist reported findings and treatment recommendations to patients' physicians vs usual care 
 length of the intervention ‐ not clear 
 number of interventions ‐ not clear; follow‐up visits scheduled every 2 to 4 weeks at the discretion of the pharmacist over 12 months
Outcomes PATIENT 
 achievement of blood pressure control based on Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V)
Notes Total professional visits (pharmacist and physician) in the intervention vs control (8.0 vs 6.6, P = 0.06)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Not explicitly mentioned
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Low risk Objective outcome assessed
Follow‐up of professionals? Low risk Not applicable
Follow‐up of patients? Low risk Based on reported data‐of the 197 patients included in the study, data was reported on all 197 patients
Baseline measurement? High risk Collected, but statistically significant difference in systolic blood pressure and number of African‐American patients between groups
Reliable outcome measures? Low risk Objective outcomes assessed
Protection against contamination? High risk Patients recruited from same medical group