Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 7;2010(7):CD000336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000336.pub2

Jameson 1995.

Methods RCT (randomized by patient)
Participants primary care practice in United States (Michigan) 
 patients at high risk for adverse consequences of drug therapy 
 patients ‐ 64 
 health professionals ‐ 1 
 practices ‐ 1 
 no unit of analysis error
Interventions targeted towards PATIENTS 
 
 pharmacist conducted a single pharmacotherapy consultation with patient, met with physician to discuss findings, conducted educational session with patient vs usual care 
 length of intervention ‐ brief (a few hours total) 
 product related
Outcomes PROCESS 
 number of drugs 
 doses of drugs 
 costs of drugs 
 PATIENT 
 compliance 
 side effects
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk "Randomised by a simple coin toss"
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Low risk Objective outcome assessed
Follow‐up of professionals? Low risk Not applicable
Follow‐up of patients? High risk 268 of 340 patients completed the study
Baseline measurement? Low risk "There were no differences in demographics between patients"
Reliable outcome measures? Low risk Objective outcome assessed
Protection against contamination? High risk Patients received care in the same clinic; communication between the pharmacist and physician could have influenced usual care