Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 20;20(5):933–948. doi: 10.1007/s10796-018-9844-9

Table 4.

Classification accuracies of tweets, using (i) bag-of-words features (BOW), (ii) proposed features (PRO). Diagonal entries are for in-domain classification, while the non-diagonal entries are for cross-domain classification. Values in the bracket represent standard deviations in case of in-domain accuracies

Train set Test set
Ebola MERS
BOW PRO BOW PRO
Ebola 84.78% (0.05) 84.02% (0.06) 65.69% 76.15%
MERS 66.19% 74.72% 88.26%(0.07) 81.05% (0.03)

In-domain classification results are represented by italic entries. For each train-test pair, the accuracy of better performing system has been boldfaced