Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 23;36(5):797–810. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9378-2

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the variables included in the analysis

Cities SARS occurred
Yes No Total
Age
 Mean 42.92 44.03 43.82
 N 324 1,360 1,684
Gender*
 Female 56.25 46.48 48.38
 Male 43.75 53.52 51.62
 N 336 1,394 1,730
Education*
 Less than elementary 4.19 6.05 5.69
 Completed elementary 6.29 14.77 13.12
 Completed junior high 8.38 14.63 13.41
 Completed senior high 31.14 33.36 32.93
 Completed junior college 19.76 14.63 15.62
 Completed university 30.24 16.57 19.22
 N 334 1,388 1,722
Family income*
 Less than NT20,000 5.67 11.14 10.08
 NT20,000–NT49,999 22.99 30.55 29.08
 NT50,000–NT99,999 46.57 40.76 41.89
 NT100,000–NT150,000 12.54 8.63 9.39
 More than NT150,000 12.24 8.91 9.56
 N 335 1,391 1,726
Marital status*
 Married/Cohabiting 71.26 74.8 74.11
 Single 22.75 19.65 20.26
 Widowed 3.89 3.53 3.6
 Divorced 2.1 2.02 2.03
 N 334 1,389 1,723
Carried out collective preventive preparation according to suggested guidelines*
 All followed 6.85 8.18 7.92
 Most followed 59.8 53.3 54.57
 Some followed 14.58 12.34 12.77
 Few followed 3.57 3.8 5.76
 Not familiar the guidelines 15.18 22.38 20.98
 N 336 1,390 1,726
Perception of Whether the community took good care of SARS patients and individuals who were quarantined*
 Very adequate 4.17 8.06 7.30
 Adequate 25.3 26.98 26.65
 Inadequate 42.26 37.05 38.06
 Completely inadequate 18.75 15.4 16.05
 Don’t Know 9.52 12.52 11.94
 N 336 1,390 1,726
Trust level*
 Very high 8.63 11.42 10.88
 High 38.39 31.97 33.22
 Not high 32.14 30.03 30.44
 Not high at all 13.99 16.88 16.32
 Don’t know 6.85 9.7 9.14
 N 336 1,392 1,728
People in the community help one another*
 Always 12.8 15.01 14.58
 Depends on occasion 58.33 54.74 55.44
 No 27.68 26.08 26.39
 Don’t know 1.19 4.17 3.59
 N 336 1,392 1,728

Taipei and Kaohsiung were cities where SARS cases were found

* Significant at 0.05 level