Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 15;2(6):442–452. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.9b00062

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Simulating allosteric modulation of functional responses and the impact of different operational parameters on modulator potency curves. For all simulations, the orthosteric agonist was defined by pKA = 6, log τA = 1, where basal = 0, Em = 100, and n = 1. In these simulations, the maximum response to orthosteric agonist approaches the system Em. The parameters governing the allosteric modulator are noted in the figure for each simulation; in all instances, affinity modulation was neutral (log α = 0) and allosteric agonism was negligible (log τB = −100). (a) Simulating the effect of a pure PAM with different degrees of efficacy cooperativity on the concentration–response curve to an orthosteric agonist. (b) From the simulations in panel a, we plotted the PAM potency at the EC20 orthosteric agonist response. (c) We performed similar simulations where log β values were held constant (equal to 1), but the modulator affinity (pKB) was changed to show the impact on PAM potency.