Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 20;4(3):259–287. doi: 10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5

Table 1.

Rating scales for assessing collaborative summary notes

1 2 3 4
Knowledge quality Opinion or conjecture; may include strong evidence of misconceptions or incorrect facts Factual, with at least 1 main point; little or no evidence of misconceptions Partly integrated explanation with at least 2 main points; explanation invokes at least one concept; no evidence of misconceptions; explanation may go beyond the stated research question Comprehensive explanation with at least three main points and invoking multiple concepts; no evidence of misconceptions, explanation may go beyond research question
Significance of findings Brief restatement of findings Significance is described Significance is described; limitations and potential for further research may not be described fully Clear explanation of significance, limitations, and further potential for inquiry