Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;15(3):e0229509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229509

Table 4. Simulation results for coverage of 90% prediction intervals.

LM SLM RF RFRK
1 0.897 0.893 0.869 0.892
2 0.901 0.894 0.874 0.897
3 0.916 0.914 0.914 0.897
4 0.914 0.917 0.916 0.894
5 0.897 0.892 0.866 0.892
6 0.903 0.894 0.869 0.894
7 0.900 0.899 0.959 0.899
8 0.899 0.907 0.955 0.905

The first column indicates the different cases, which are summarized in Table 3. Values were averaged over 20 independent simulation runs.