Table 4. Simulation results for coverage of 90% prediction intervals.
LM | SLM | RF | RFRK | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.897 | 0.893 | 0.869 | 0.892 |
2 | 0.901 | 0.894 | 0.874 | 0.897 |
3 | 0.916 | 0.914 | 0.914 | 0.897 |
4 | 0.914 | 0.917 | 0.916 | 0.894 |
5 | 0.897 | 0.892 | 0.866 | 0.892 |
6 | 0.903 | 0.894 | 0.869 | 0.894 |
7 | 0.900 | 0.899 | 0.959 | 0.899 |
8 | 0.899 | 0.907 | 0.955 | 0.905 |
The first column indicates the different cases, which are summarized in Table 3. Values were averaged over 20 independent simulation runs.