Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 4;53(1):71–76. doi: 10.1007/s11262-016-1405-z

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of the sensitivity of nanoPCR and conventional PCR assays. Serial tenfold dilutions of recombinant plasmids pMD18-T-PEDV-N and pMD18-T-TGEV-N were used as templates. The results of conventional PCR and nanoPCR assays are shown in (a) and (b), respectively. Lane M DL2000 marker, Lane 1 negative control, Lanes 2–10 pMD18-T-PEDV-N concentrations ranging from 7.6 × 108 to 7.6 × 100 copies/μL, pMD18-T-TGEV-N concentrations ranging from 8.5 × 108 to 8.5 × 100 copies/μL