Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 4;53(1):71–76. doi: 10.1007/s11262-016-1405-z

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of the sensitivity of nanoPCR and conventional PCR assays. Tenfold serial dilutions of PEDV and TGEV RNA (24 and 17 μg/mL, respectively) were used as templates for nanoPCR and conventional PCR. The results of nanoPCR and conventional PCR assays are shown in (a) and (b), respectively. Lane M DL2000 marker, Lane 1 negative control, Lanes 26 serial dilutions of RNA templates